Criteria for Oral Presentation Prizes in a Conference

Oral presentation prizes at SMC joint conferences are typically awarded based on a combination of

scientific content, delivery quality, and engagement. Top criteria include originality of research, clarity of the research question and findings, visual impact of slides, effective time management, and the ability to answer questions.

Key Evaluation Criteria

• Scientific Quality & Impact (40-50%): Originality and innovation of the study, suitability of methodology, and significance of findings for the field.

• Presentation & Delivery (30-40%): Clarity of speech, enthusiasm, audience engagement, and structural organization of the talk.

• Visual Aids (10-20%): Quality and design of slides—ensuring they are legible, uncluttered, and enhance the message rather than just containing text.

• Q&A Session (10-20%): Knowledge and confidence in answering questions, demonstrating a deep understanding of the work.

• Time Management: Adhering strictly to the assigned time slot (e.g., 20 mins talk + 10 mins Q&A).

Commonly Used Assessment Factors

• Structure: Introduction, methods, results, and conclusion must be logical and easy to follow.

• Novelty: Does the research introduce a new concept or improve an existing method?

• Impact: Real-world or academic relevance of the study.

• Professional Conduct: Adhering to the format, presenting clearly, and engaging professionally.

   

Award Eligibility & Tips

• Target Audience: Often prioritized for early-career researchers, PhD students, or postdoctoral fellows.

• Preparation: Effective use of visual materials and preparing for common questions is vital for winning.

• Selection Process: Usually, a judging panel will attend the session and use a scoring sheet based on these criteria to determine the winner, often with a calibration meeting between judges.

Here's where you can enter in text. Feel free to edit, move, delete or add a different page element.